Moog Rogue and Concertmate MG-1

A forum for comparing two or more synths against each other. Also known as "versus" threads.

Moog Rogue and Concertmate MG-1

Postby WakemanFan55 » Tue Sep 02, 2008 9:46 pm

Hi there.
I was reading around on the internet and discovered Moog Rogue and Concertmate MG-1
i know that the Concertmate was aimed at the home market, and has this 10 voice polyphonic "organ" sound.
But do they have the same features exept from this "organ" sound
if not, wich one of them is best?, i cant find any comparison on these two on the internet

(I wasnt sure where to put this post, if it is more suitable in the Buyer's Guide, move it over there :) )
WakemanFan55
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 6:59 pm

Advertisement:

Re: Moog Rogue and Concertmate MG-1

Postby ronP » Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:01 pm

oo

Yes, one for Buyer's Guide, indeed . . .

Meanwhile, MOOG The Rogue has pitch and mod wheels and no organ polyphony preset.

The MG-1 has a polyphony preset, which is a transister organ sound that resembles a flat square wave x 10 voices, but with added resonance (and outboard effects) it can be musically usable. VSE member redchapterjubilee has some recordings of that sound in the Listening Lounge which are quite good.

:)

oo
BEHRINGER Xenyx 802; CASIO Casiotone MT-70; KORG Electribe EA-1mkII, microKORG, mini-KP; QUIKLOK T20 T-REX Series X;
ROLAND Micro-CUBE; YAMAHA PSS130, PSS140; ZOOM FS-01, MRS-4B, MRT-3B

Wanted: BOSS DR-110; CASIO CZ-101; YAMAHA CS-01, DX-100
User avatar
ronP
Active Member
Active Member
 
Posts: 477
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 7:20 pm
Location: New York, NY, USA
Gear: BEHRINGER Xenyx 802; CASIO MT-70; KORG EA-1 mkII, MicroKorg, microSTATION, MicroX, Mini-KP, Monotron; ROLAND Micro Cube; ZOOM FS01, MRS-4B, MRT-3B
Band: Keyfish

Re: Moog Rogue and Concertmate MG-1

Postby WakemanFan55 » Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:14 pm

Yeah sorry, wrong place to post it.
but thanks.

so the tweaking you can do on those two is basically the same?
WakemanFan55
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 6:59 pm

Re: Moog Rogue and Concertmate MG-1

Postby Automatic Gainsay » Wed Sep 03, 2008 1:45 am

The polyphonic section of the MG-1 isn't an "organ," and it isn't 10 voices. It is fully polyphonic. Every key plays... you can hold them all down at once. This polyphonic section ends up being paraphonic, it is forced through a single filter and VCA arrangement. But, as was stated, this does not mean it is worthless. The filter and filter modulations affect it. I can sound very much like a synthesizer at any point, due to this. The only negative aspect is that it is either on or off, which means that you can't get any decay on the sound.

The Rogue and the MG-1 do not have the same functionality.
In some cases one exceeds the other, and in other cases, the other exceeds the one.

One of the primary things to remember is that with the MG-1, you may not like paraphonic synthesizers... but you don't have to play chords on them. If you don't play chords, you can think of the paraphonic section as an extra squarewave oscillator... and this oscillator is SEPARATELY TUNEABLE... so, basically... you can get 3 osc sounds. That, in itself, is an amazing boon.
On top of that... if you've got the paraphonic section lower in the mix than the two monophonic oscillators, and you happen to play two notes or a chord here and there, the ear is tricked into thinking that that chord occurred in the patch, and not in some extraneous squarewave polyphonic paraphonic section. With a little skill, it is very easy to fool the listener into thinking this is a full featured polyphonic synth.

A lot of differences are simply knob vs. slider.

Others are subtle tradeoffs. The MG-1 has sliders for modulation amount, the Rogue has switches. The MG-1 has switchable keyboard-filter-modulation, the Rogue has a slider. The MG-1 allows switchable octaves and a range of 2nd osc tuning. The Rogue a switch for the octaves of both oscs together, but allows interval tuning to an octave.

The MG-1 allows one osc to be set to square, and one osc to be set to saw.

The Rogue allows the env to affect the sync. Both have sync, but the sync modulation is manual on the MG-1.

The Rogue has a mod wheel and a pitch wheel.

The MG-1 has a variable ringmod effect.

The Rogue has overdrive, the MG-1 has polyphony.

In the end, I think it comes down to taste. The Rogue probably excels in sound quality, the MG-1 excels in having extra functionality.

The GOOD news is, despite both of them balancing out in a lot of ways, the Rogue is stupidly more expensive than the MG-1...
‎"I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." -Charles Babbage
"Unity and Mediocrity are forever in bed together." -Zane W.
http://www.youtube.com/automaticgainsay
User avatar
Automatic Gainsay
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
 
Posts: 3856
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:22 am
Location: Tacoma
Gear: Minimoog, ARP 2600, CS-15, CS-50, MiniBrute, MicroBrute, Dubreq S2, Korg MS-20 Mini, 3 Volcas, Hohner Pianet T, Wurlitzer 7300, Wurlitzer 145-A.
Band: Godfrey's Cordial

Re: Moog Rogue and Concertmate MG-1

Postby Slickie » Wed Sep 03, 2008 3:38 am

don't forget...no envelope control on that polyphony for the mg-1.....kind of a biggie for me...its either on or off.
Slickie
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 71
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 7:58 pm

Re: Moog Rogue and Concertmate MG-1

Postby Automatic Gainsay » Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:59 am

Slickie wrote:don't forget...no envelope control on that polyphony for the mg-1.....kind of a biggie for me...its either on or off.


Well, you're half right.
The polyphonic section is on or off, but as such, allows the attack stage of the envelope full control. It's only the release stage which has no effect.
‎"I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." -Charles Babbage
"Unity and Mediocrity are forever in bed together." -Zane W.
http://www.youtube.com/automaticgainsay
User avatar
Automatic Gainsay
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
 
Posts: 3856
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:22 am
Location: Tacoma
Gear: Minimoog, ARP 2600, CS-15, CS-50, MiniBrute, MicroBrute, Dubreq S2, Korg MS-20 Mini, 3 Volcas, Hohner Pianet T, Wurlitzer 7300, Wurlitzer 145-A.
Band: Godfrey's Cordial

Re: Moog Rogue and Concertmate MG-1

Postby redchapterjubilee » Wed Sep 03, 2008 2:54 pm

Plus you gotta alter your playing style to take into account that while the synth engine is fully polyphonic the envelope is not.

I had an MG-1 for three years (thanks for the props RonP!) and loved it. I played in a band for most of that time with a guy who used a Moog Rogue and we were able to compare notes soundwise. The Rogue seemed a slight bit fuller to me. The Rogue has Moog oscillators afterall, and the MG-1 does not. Both share filters though. I certainly prefer the MG-1 to the Rogue because of the ring mod, independent oscillator octave controls and the polyphony, which is cooler than it looks on paper. It is certainly useable. Plus the MG-1 is generally $200 - $300 cheaper than the Rogue.

If I love it so much why did I sell it? Well, my music started to change somewhat and I was looking for something a little more burly and wound up three synths later (thanks UPS! Fuckers) with my Source, which is beyond burly. But I often miss the immediacy and the thinner, brighter MG-1. I hope to get another one someday.
http://www.soundcloud.com/kellyminnis
ANALOG SYNTHESIZERS + EFFECTS + COMPUTERS
User avatar
redchapterjubilee
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Posts: 897
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 3:59 pm
Location: College Station, TX

Re: Moog Rogue and Concertmate MG-1

Postby Slickie » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:47 pm

yeah the MG-1 definetly has a thin sound to the oscillators....filter was ok though.
Slickie
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 71
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 7:58 pm

Re: Moog Rogue and Concertmate MG-1

Postby Henfield » Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:56 am

Other differences between the two include : 1) That the Rogue has CV and Gate Ins and Outs, while the MG-1 only has CV and Gate In, so the Rogue can control other mono synths, Moogerfoogers, etc... 2) The Rogue actually has an audio input to process signals through the Filter and VCA. The MG-1 has inputs, but they are directly routed to the outputs and do not process any sound through the synth. There are some mods listed on the net to fix this problem with the MG-1. and 3) The MG-1 was not designed for musicians, it was designed for people that had home stereos, so all of the audio inputs and outputs on the back are rca jacks, not the stndard 1/4" jacks that are on the Rogue. To me, the Rogue sounded better, but that may also be due to the fact that there was an audible whine from the rca outputs on the MG-1

One last difference is the standard Moog Pitch and Mod wheels on the Rogue, which the MG-1 does not have. This can be a deal breaker for most people.
Last edited by Henfield on Tue Sep 16, 2008 3:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Henfield
Junior Member
Junior Member
 
Posts: 124
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 12:19 am
Location: Detroit, MI
Gear: MU Modular in a Moog 1P style cabinet, Moog Minitaur, and Moogerfooger rack.

Re: Moog Rogue and Concertmate MG-1

Postby WhinyLittleRunt » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:00 pm

Never knew that the oscillators were not Moog...

I thought the entire synth was built by Moog for Realistic? Moog has their name stamped on the PC board inside.

You sure about that?
http://officialmikethompson.blogspot.com
gear: oberheim ob-8 | moog micromoog | moog opus 3 | yamaha s90es | yamaha dx-7 mk I | arp omni-2 | 82 rhodes mark II stage | wurlitzer 200a | hammond m-100
User avatar
WhinyLittleRunt
Active Member
Active Member
 
Posts: 345
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 1:41 am
Location: CT
Gear: oberheim ob-8 | moog micromoog | moog opus-3 | yamaha s90es | yamaha dx-7 mkI | arp omni-2 | 1982 rhodes mkII stage | wurlitzer 200a | hammond m-100

Re: Moog Rogue and Concertmate MG-1

Postby Automatic Gainsay » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:23 pm

WhinyLittleRunt wrote:Never knew that the oscillators were not Moog...

I thought the entire synth was built by Moog for Realistic? Moog has their name stamped on the PC board inside.

You sure about that?


I had heard that before, too. There is a block of text supposedly written by someone largely involved in the creation of the MG-1 somewheres out there on the net wherein he says that, if I remember correctly.

Even so, I object to the notion that the MG-1's oscs are somehow "thin" because they're not Moog oscillators. If they're thin because they're not Moog, there are a LOT of thin oscillators out there... on popular synths! :) It is not difficult to get big broad sounds out of the MG-1.
‎"I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." -Charles Babbage
"Unity and Mediocrity are forever in bed together." -Zane W.
http://www.youtube.com/automaticgainsay
User avatar
Automatic Gainsay
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
 
Posts: 3856
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:22 am
Location: Tacoma
Gear: Minimoog, ARP 2600, CS-15, CS-50, MiniBrute, MicroBrute, Dubreq S2, Korg MS-20 Mini, 3 Volcas, Hohner Pianet T, Wurlitzer 7300, Wurlitzer 145-A.
Band: Godfrey's Cordial

Re: Moog Rogue and Concertmate MG-1

Postby redchapterjubilee » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:47 pm

I don't know if the synth is thinner because of the non-Moog oscillators or if it's just a sub-par signal path. After all, there's no pro-quality output on the MG-1. The RCA's were horrible on mine so I used the headphone jack out. All I know is head-to-head with the other two Moogs I've spent time with (the Rogue and the Source) the MG-1 was not as full and did not have quite the presence that the other two had. Doesn't mean that the overall tone is necessarily "thin" but to my ears it was certainly a sharper, pointier sound than the other two. If given a choice between a Rogue or MG-1 I'd choose the latter everytime.

At one point I had gathered a lot of info on the MG-1 from the Internets, and one of the men responsible for the design of the MG-1 admitted that the MG-1 does not use Moog parts aside from the VCF. The rest of the parts were made in Italy. Moog designed the synth and ultimately put it together, but Radio Shack insisted on the cheaper parts, the organ tone and the RCA I/O's. Moog took the design and used stock Moog parts to make the Rogue, which began manufacture about 18 months after the MG-1 began production.
http://www.soundcloud.com/kellyminnis
ANALOG SYNTHESIZERS + EFFECTS + COMPUTERS
User avatar
redchapterjubilee
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Posts: 897
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 3:59 pm
Location: College Station, TX

Re: Moog Rogue and Concertmate MG-1

Postby Automatic Gainsay » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:52 pm

redchapterjubilee wrote:I don't know if the synth is thinner because of the non-Moog oscillators or if it's just a sub-par signal path. After all, there's no pro-quality output on the MG-1. The RCA's were horrible on mine so I used the headphone jack out. All I know is head-to-head with the other two Moogs I've spent time with (the Rogue and the Source) the MG-1 was not as full and did not have quite the presence that the other two had. Doesn't mean that the overall tone is necessarily "thin" but to my ears it was certainly a sharper, pointier sound than the other two. If given a choice between a Rogue or MG-1 I'd choose the latter everytime..

I would totally agree with that!
‎"I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." -Charles Babbage
"Unity and Mediocrity are forever in bed together." -Zane W.
http://www.youtube.com/automaticgainsay
User avatar
Automatic Gainsay
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
 
Posts: 3856
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:22 am
Location: Tacoma
Gear: Minimoog, ARP 2600, CS-15, CS-50, MiniBrute, MicroBrute, Dubreq S2, Korg MS-20 Mini, 3 Volcas, Hohner Pianet T, Wurlitzer 7300, Wurlitzer 145-A.
Band: Godfrey's Cordial

Re: Moog Rogue and Concertmate MG-1

Postby Automatic Gainsay » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:56 pm

Date: Sat, 24 Apr 1999 23:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@airmail.net>
To: inman@interpath.com,
synth-diy@mailhost.bpa.nl
Sender: owner-synth-diy@mailhost.bpa.nl
Subject: Re: Paul's "Moog"

>Paul S. designed the Radio Shack Moog! I'll be damned.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Since this pops up every now and then, and I'm taking a break bagging up
7,620 resistors, here is the "story".

Radio Shack has no engineering. Rather, that falls (er...'fell') under TSD
(Tandy Systems Design). Also, twice a year Radio Shack holds a private version
of COMDEX/CES, just for them! Vendors line up 50 deep and present their wares.
Back then (early '80s) about 40% of gear in a Radio Shack was bought 'outside'.
Most electronics was made in a Korean factory that Tandy owned a majority
share called EnCal (EnCal made all of Pioneer's and Alpine's car stereos
there).

So, during one of these mini-trade shows who is on the presentation list
(which TSD got in advance) but a one 'Dr. D. Luce'. Well, when I saw Mr.
PolyMoog on the list I had to see this. So sure enough here he wanders in
with a hand-made small synth. He demos it. Bernie Appel, the #1 decision maker
(er...the *ONLY* decision maker of what went in the store or not) had this type
of conversation (I am giving not exact, but the general idea. It was 16-17
years ago!)

BA: What the f*** is that piece of s***? (BA enjoyed treating all new
vendors this way. This was his equivalent of "Hello.")
DDL: It's a music synthesizer prototype. [Proceeds on a 3 minute demo. You
had 5 minutes to present. Period!!]
BA: (interested, but certainly not going to show it to the Yankee geek) How
the hell do you plug it in?
DDL points out the 1/4" jack.
BA: Where in the holy hell, in my store (they were always referred to as "my
stores") does that thing go? Up my ass?

See, RS had not a single piece of gear that had 1/4" jacks! All RCA. BA knew
this.

DDL at this point looks like he's gonna puke. He's quivering & sweating like
a whore in church (sorry, that's another BA expression!)

BA: Play me a tune. [DDL one-fingers a classical thingy.]

BA: That damn thing busted? What's with this 1 finger shit?
[DDL explains about monophonic blah blah blah.]

BA turns to me.

BA: You know what the hell he's talking about?
Me: (thinking this is a trick question) Err...yeah.
BA to DDL: We'll look at it. NEXT!!!!

So began the Luce/Schreiber effort. What he had was the boards out of a
Minimoog, no A440 osc, no noise, in a box. So, I got handed that, designed
the MG-1 version (added the organ stuff BECAUSE BA was convinced that typical
RS customers wanted more than 1 note). Added RCA jacks, ring mod do-dad. Then,
had to specify parts that Moog never had to use: cheapo pots. I'll admit it:
CHEAPO. They were ALPS and I think we paid (back then) about 23 cents apiece.

That is because the RS gross profit margin was an unheard of 63% (the
average of ALL the Forture 500 is like 8%) and lastly, I spent about 3 weeks
on just the panel layout and color scheme & wrote the Owner's Manual along
with, oddly enough, Steve Leininger who designed the TRS-80. He played a Vox
in a jazz band and BA wanted his opinion as well.

Luce and I went back & forth about 5 months until they delivered the
"pre-production" units. Moog made them, Tandy supplied most of the parts (we
had a company in Japan that bought parts and resold them to Tandy. One day
I'll tell my funny modem capacitor story.)

So, the story was:

a) Moog presented the original idea to RS
b) They dumped it on me. I had to make it "Radio Shack compliant". Which
meant a re-design. Used the 3046 + Tel Labs tempco for the VCO. More
Electronotes than Moog! Moog ladder filter, 3080 VCA. Prototype had mod
wheel; *PUNT!*. Cost like $3. Get real.
c) Moog built it.
d) Tandy had 18 months exclusive. Moog then made the Rogue which is my
design without the organ/ring mod, wheels back on.
e) No, I didn't get a free MG-1 or a Rogue.
f) No, I didn't get alot of money. At that time I was making about $21,500/yr.

Final note: NO!!! I DID NOT pick that stupid black felt that lays over the
sliders, then turns to tar. That was Luce's deal. But, I DID get Luce to send
me *every* piece of Moog literature at the time: still have it!

Paul Schreiber
Synthesis Technology
‎"I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." -Charles Babbage
"Unity and Mediocrity are forever in bed together." -Zane W.
http://www.youtube.com/automaticgainsay
User avatar
Automatic Gainsay
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
 
Posts: 3856
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:22 am
Location: Tacoma
Gear: Minimoog, ARP 2600, CS-15, CS-50, MiniBrute, MicroBrute, Dubreq S2, Korg MS-20 Mini, 3 Volcas, Hohner Pianet T, Wurlitzer 7300, Wurlitzer 145-A.
Band: Godfrey's Cordial

Re: Moog Rogue and Concertmate MG-1

Postby sizzlemeister » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:15 pm

You have to be kidding me - "not Moog oscillators". The entire thing was made in the Williamsville Moog factory. How can it not be anything but all Moog - unless you think non-Bob Moog designs aren't Moogs. The MG1 sounds fabulous.
User avatar
sizzlemeister
Junior Member
Junior Member
 
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 3:44 pm

Next

Return to Synth Shootouts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 2 guests