Yamaha TX802 vs. Casio VZ-10 M

A forum for comparing two or more synths against each other. Also known as "versus" threads.

Yamaha TX802 vs. Casio VZ-10 M

Postby og_penson » Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:05 am

I'm thinking about getting one or the other. I've done my share of reading online and listening to demos and know both are quite different from your average analog-like subtractive synth and require some time to get used to, not the least because of the rather un-intuitive way of editing sounds.
Has anyone used both of them and can say something about working with them, their sound-possibilities and an overall opinion?
og_penson
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 12:33 pm
Location: Berlin
Gear: DSI Evolver, Yamaha VS-200 & CS1x, GEM S3, Stylophone, Fender Marauder, Alesis PercPad
Band: Foxbird

Advertisement:

Re: Yamaha TX802 vs. Casio VZ-10 M

Postby plus321 » Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:52 am

I had a TX802 for a long time. I hated it because it didn't have a data slider. I feel like it really makes a big difference when editing something that complex. I got a TX81Z later to replace it, but if I ever got another fm synth, it would definitely have a data slider. It's too annoying to program otherwise.

Anyway, other than that, the TX802 sounds great; does everything you expect. Never used the Casio.
plus321
Active Member
Active Member
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 2:44 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Re: Yamaha TX802 vs. Casio VZ-10 M

Postby rhino » Sat Sep 21, 2013 9:07 pm

EDIT: Welcome to the board!


Go for the Yamaha...although I like the VZ myself: Hell-in-a-can to program, but can scream, bark and fizz like nothing else. Don't look for "piano and strings", or "choral pad" sounds. Think more along the lines of "prying rusty nails out of a skull" vibe. What I'm trying to say, is the VZ is a specialty synth - it's best use is for seasoning...like garlic, wasabi, or broken glass.

EDIT: If you go for the VZ, be sure the display is working 100%. Casio used a propriatary LCD on the VZ and FZ synths, and AFAIK, there is NO substitute.
"A thing may seem impossible...until it's done."
--Nelson Mandela
User avatar
rhino
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
 
Posts: 2492
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: kentucky hills
Real name: bill
Gear: keepers:
Kurzweil K2500x
Ensoniq TS-12
Yamaha SY-99
Alesis QS-8
Roland JD-800
Roland JX-10
Akai AX-80
Ensoniq SQ-80
Korg DSS-1
Moog Mini
Fizmo

Re: Yamaha TX802 vs. Casio VZ-10 M

Postby Pro5 » Wed Dec 11, 2013 10:47 am

TX-802 all day every day of the year. :D
V-SYNTH | JX-3P | AN1x | JD-800 | POLYSIX x2 | PERFORMER
HAD: SH101/JUNO 1,2,6,60/MKS70,50/JX8P/D50,70/JV1080/AX80/SY77,85/DX7,IID,S,100 /TG77,500/TX802,81Z/MS2k/DW8000/PROPHECY/WAVESTATION/M1/KSRACK/CZ1
User avatar
Pro5
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Posts: 934
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:30 pm
Location: U.K

Re: Yamaha TX802 vs. Casio VZ-10 M

Postby madtheory » Wed Dec 11, 2013 5:44 pm

rhino wrote:EDIT: Welcome to the board!


Go for the Yamaha...although I like the VZ myself: Hell-in-a-can to program, but can scream, bark and fizz like nothing else. Don't look for "piano and strings", or "choral pad" sounds. Think more along the lines of "prying rusty nails out of a skull" vibe. What I'm trying to say, is the VZ is a specialty synth - it's best use is for seasoning...like garlic, wasabi, or broken glass.

EDIT: If you go for the VZ, be sure the display is working 100%. Casio used a propriatary LCD on the VZ and FZ synths, and AFAIK, there is NO substitute.

Haha! Perfect description of the VZ. Having used both, I would say "neither". For me FM8 makes FM synthesis vastly more accessible than any hardware synth, and with better sound quality. Plus it can load DX/ TX sysex.
User avatar
madtheory
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
 
Posts: 3289
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 12:45 pm
Location: Cork, Ireland
Real name: Tomas Mulcahy
Gear: Fabreeze, Buck Owens Moog, Korg Warlock 9000, Roland Sultan of Brunei, Moog Ribald Cat.
Band: madtheory

Re: Yamaha TX802 vs. Casio VZ-10 M

Postby Pro5 » Thu Dec 12, 2013 11:32 am

Definitely more accessible and the sound quality is fine, but even as a heavy user of FM8 it gives me a completely different feeling/inspiration to using real FM hardware. Esp the DX/TX range that has some kinda edge that I just don't hear in the software - even if I run it out and back into my interface.

For those that want an FM rack though - the TX802 is the best choice imo. TG77 if you want something that is a bit smoother and more advanced but will lack the more instant 'DX' Vibe that the TX802 has.
V-SYNTH | JX-3P | AN1x | JD-800 | POLYSIX x2 | PERFORMER
HAD: SH101/JUNO 1,2,6,60/MKS70,50/JX8P/D50,70/JV1080/AX80/SY77,85/DX7,IID,S,100 /TG77,500/TX802,81Z/MS2k/DW8000/PROPHECY/WAVESTATION/M1/KSRACK/CZ1
User avatar
Pro5
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Posts: 934
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:30 pm
Location: U.K

Re: Yamaha TX802 vs. Casio VZ-10 M

Postby 8bit9bot » Thu Dec 26, 2013 2:55 am

in 2001 i got the FS1R... used it for DX7 sounds exclusively... later upgraded (yes its an upgrade) to TX7 which sounds more full - and now i am on the TX802... i have never sold any of these synths without replacing them with another model - hardware DX7 sounds are essential for me - with an editing program it's super easy to edit the DX/TX's

i have never been a fan of casio CZ or VZ... they are more "low budget" sounding... literally they sound toy-like - but if you like really obscure sounds it's worth a shot
8bit9bot
No Longer Registered
 


Return to Synth Shootouts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests