Roland JX showdown: JX-3P vs JX-8P vs Super JX10

A forum for comparing two or more synths against each other. Also known as "versus" threads.

Roland JX showdown: JX-3P vs JX-8P vs Super JX10

Postby vuuv » Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:44 am

Without the PG programmers, eBay prices for the three are all pretty equal. The programmers obviously increase the cost quite a bit but still end up cheaper than something like a polysix or juno60, at this point. Without the programmer, it seems like the 3p is a bit easier to program, but is less robust than the 8 or 10.....your ideas here:
vuuv
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2013 7:02 am

Advertisement:

Re: Roland JX showdown: JX-3P vs JX-8P vs Super JX10

Postby Pro5 » Fri Feb 07, 2014 8:52 am

less robust? what does that mean? sound wise? physically?

no

the 3P is by far the most interesting sounding, the most analog sounding and the one I kept (out of that and the 8P). 8P/10 have far more features and esp the 2nd env which is handy, however it's main usefulness is for pads/strings and a certain samey pads/strings at that. For almost all other sounds other synths sound better to me.

As for the 3P it sounds more like a Juno (but not quite) and maybe a tiny tiny tiny hint of the more percussive side of a Jupiter 6 (and sometimes 8) as it has a much better filter than the 8P/10. It's more genuinely punchy, clearer sounding and has a metallic vibe and retro fun factor.

Yes 3P is easier to program without the programmer (edit mode a/b then a single button press vs having to type in parameter numbers on the 8/10) - however you can hook any midi box up to the 8/10 but not the 3P as it doesn't have sysx/cc - you can fit a mod (as I have) that enables this though.

Sound wise it's down to taste/pref - they can sound a bit similar on some sounds but generally do different things. 3P is definitely more what you'd think of an early 80s analog Roland sound, though lacking a bit in bass and has no real PWM. While the 8P/10 were obviously designed to compete more with digital (DX7) and tend to go towards pads, e-pianos etc. They can both do big sync sounds but it just sounds purer on the 3P to my ears.

8P/10 can sound MASSIVE though (which 3P doesn't) but I have no use for 8P's sound in my music. I also think the 8P tends to sound more dated funnily enough, as it's overall tone that is hard to work away from will remind you of the mid 80s power ballads and the cure stuff. While the 3P has a more timeless tone (while obviously being early 80s if you want it to be).

Long story short I adore the 3P, I can't stand the 8P (and the JX-10 is just a pain to work with thanks to bad midi and silly patch/tone system) - though If you want the power of the later JX's I'd go for the MKS-70! more power than the 8P and more reliable/functional than the 10! MKS-70 is a great buy on the 2nd hand market.
Last edited by Pro5 on Thu Aug 14, 2014 4:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
V-SYNTH | JX-3P | AN1x | JD-800 | POLYSIX x2 | PERFORMER
HAD: SH101/JUNO 1,2,6,60/MKS70,50/JX8P/D50,70/JV1080/AX80/SY77,85/DX7,IID,S,100 /TG77,500/TX802,81Z/MS2k/DW8000/PROPHECY/WAVESTATION/M1/KSRACK/CZ1
User avatar
Pro5
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Posts: 934
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:30 pm
Location: U.K

Re: Roland JX showdown: JX-3P vs JX-8P vs Super JX10

Postby commodorejohn » Fri Feb 07, 2014 9:27 am

Man, the JX-10 gets such a bad rap. Yes, the MIDI sucks, yes, the range of sound is limited, but within that range it's just a pure joy. Super-classy, lush, mellow, restrained tones are what it excels at - somehow even the stuff like oscillator sync that generates weird yowly tones on other synths comes out sounding refined on the JX-10. You have to go into full-on cross-mod-with-heavy-pitch-modulation territory before it even approaches sounding nasty and dirty. So when you employ those features, there's a whole world of classy, mellow sounds that on other synths would be getting funky and nasty to be explored. It may not be a jack-of-all-trades, but dammit, it certainly approaches being a master of some.
Computers: Amiga 1200, DEC VAXStation 4000/60, DEC MicroPDP-11/73
commodorejohn
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Posts: 982
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2013 2:39 am
Location: Duluth, MN
Real name: John
Gear: Roland JX-10/MT-32/D-10, Oberheim Matrix-6, Yamaha DX7/DX7-IIFD/FB-01, Korg MS-20 Mini/DSS-1, Hohner String Performer

Re: Roland JX showdown: JX-3P vs JX-8P vs Super JX10

Postby nathanscribe » Fri Feb 07, 2014 10:25 am

The 10 also has a nice long keyboard with a decent semi-weighted action, four outputs, and sounds massive when layered - I made a brass patch using 2 detuned oscs and mild chorus, layered and detuned again. The low end was fantastic.

Mostly the 10 excels at big smooth sounds, and the layering is something to consider, given that you still get a 6-voice analogue after that. Without layering, where else are you going to get 12 analogue-filtered voices for the price?
User avatar
nathanscribe
VSE Review Contributor
VSE Review Contributor
 
Posts: 2936
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 1:03 pm
Location: The right side of the Pennines

Re: Roland JX showdown: JX-3P vs JX-8P vs Super JX10

Postby Swayze » Fri Feb 07, 2014 12:05 pm

I absolutely agree with the previous posts. You guys know your JX's and your descriptions are spot on. :clap:

So I'll attempt not to repeat to much of what's been said already. I also favor the 3P over the 8P in the sound department. To me, the 3P punches while the 8P purrrsss. Although neither sound quite like a Juno 6/60, the 3P gets much closer and fits the bill for that vintage Roland DCO sound, and is much more interesting than the Juno to boot. That's why it's a keeper for me. Both JX's sound kinda dull next to a Juno, but the 3P still has a pleasant and edgy sound of it's own.

The 8P, while well suited for pads, just had this numb-sounding timbre that was fatiguing to my ears. It's hard to describe but it had this "weight" in the low mids that would literally give me a headache. As a result, I've avoided it's successor the JX10 as well. The added features and superior keybeds with aftertouch don't make the later JX's winners in my book. JX3P FTMFW!!! :thumbright:
User avatar
Swayze
Junior Member
Junior Member
 
Posts: 193
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 1:49 am
Location: Carson City, NV
Gear: Mono/Poly, Microbrute, JX3P, V-Synth, JD990, TG77, EX8000, CZ101, Drumtraks

Re: Roland JX showdown: JX-3P vs JX-8P vs Super JX10

Postby pflosi » Fri Feb 07, 2014 12:12 pm

What I like most about the three of them is the super cool sequencer in the 3P.

Regarding filters: 3P is IR3109, like the JU6/60 or JP8... 10 and 8P are both IR-3R05. Maybe that helps :thumbright:
User avatar
pflosi
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
 
Posts: 3154
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:14 pm
Location: zürich
Gear: more than 150 characters...

Re: Roland JX showdown: JX-3P vs JX-8P vs Super JX10

Postby tomorrowstops » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:02 pm

but the JX-10 is......so uuuggggllly
tomorrowstops
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
 
Posts: 726
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:55 pm
Location: Portland, ME

Re: Roland JX showdown: JX-3P vs JX-8P vs Super JX10

Postby nathanscribe » Fri Feb 07, 2014 7:05 pm

No, it's beautiful. Like an early '80s calculator.
User avatar
nathanscribe
VSE Review Contributor
VSE Review Contributor
 
Posts: 2936
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 1:03 pm
Location: The right side of the Pennines

Re: Roland JX showdown: JX-3P vs JX-8P vs Super JX10

Postby synthroom » Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:04 pm

I agree with the assessments above. I love the 3P - It's a keeper. I had a 8P and while I didn't find it as interesting as the 3P, it's got merit. I sold the 8P with the intention of getting a JX-10 someday.
Fairlight IIx (Mid-Life Crisis - cheaper than a Corvette!)
Roland JP-8, D-50, S-50, S-550(2x), S-760(2x), JX-3P, JD-800
EII, Emax II, Minimoog, ARP 2600, P-5 Rev.1 (broken...), Pro-One, Crumar Performer, K1m, K5m, MS-2000B, Virus KC, a few other things.
User avatar
synthroom
Active Member
Active Member
 
Posts: 593
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 3:16 pm
Location: pdx
Real name: Kirk
Gear: Fairlight IIx(!), JP-8, D-50, S-50+550, S-760, JX-3P, JD-800, EII, Emax II, Mini, ARP 2600, P-5 Rev.1, Pro-One, Performer, K1m, K5m, few other things.

Re: Roland JX showdown: JX-3P vs JX-8P vs Super JX10

Postby princefan3 » Sat Feb 08, 2014 7:34 pm

Never had a JX10 so cant comment there...

i favour the JX8P as its a synth that has learnt its lessons from before..the sound is lush and i was planning to use it with a Linn 9000...instant miami vice....its not a responsive synth and i can understand peoples frustration
main drawback is its size for its use that it gets, but just look at the amount of stars that have used her.

i liked the JX3P, sequencer was interesting, although wandered. i would agree that programming was easier than
i was expecting, sounded too tinny in the end and not enough bass....no octave option which frustrated the hell
out of me...and the midi was weird...couldnt be arsed in the end.

i sold it and got Juno 60, what an improvement....dont really miss the JX3P now.

thought it better to go juno 60 + JX8P..... against juno 60/ JX3P they sound too similar.
princefan3
Junior Member
Junior Member
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 12:27 pm

Re: Roland JX showdown: JX-3P vs JX-8P vs Super JX10

Postby vuuv » Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:14 am

Awesome, thanks, everyone! That all kinda confirms what I was feeling but didn't have like, first-hand knowledge about.

AND it turns out, just in a stroke of luck, tonight a 3p with the programmer JUST popped up and is available to buy in town now and a pretty dang reasonable price but.....would clear out a big chunk of the money I have at the moment. Not enough to drive me to ramen for two weeks but.....it'd be tough, and I'm trying to talk myself either into or out of it (if I don't get that, I might as well grab the tx81z that just popped up, anyway, since it's cheap).
vuuv
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2013 7:02 am

Re: Roland JX showdown: JX-3P vs JX-8P vs Super JX10

Postby princefan3 » Mon Feb 10, 2014 11:14 am

Hi Vuuv.....had a TX81Z also...you have to work that thing hard though...tops for bass..but other sounds
sounded scratchy..no strings....one trick pony came to mind.

i would go get the JX3P with programmer..you will learn more from the experiance than a TX81Z.
i ve learnt you have to spend more in the end, but the reward is that you can just sell on if you dont like it.
which i did in the end.

i did love the size of the JX3P..the guy that i sold it to has kept in touch with me and modded her to a KIWI kit
and made a fully working software programme of the programmer. amazing.

good luck with your purchases anyway.
princefan3
Junior Member
Junior Member
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 12:27 pm

Re: Roland JX showdown: JX-3P vs JX-8P vs Super JX10

Postby commodorejohn » Mon Feb 10, 2014 7:40 pm

If you want the sound of the TX81Z, I'd hold off and go for a V50 when you spot one for a good price. Keyboard, twice the polyphony, vastly improved MIDI implementation.
Computers: Amiga 1200, DEC VAXStation 4000/60, DEC MicroPDP-11/73
commodorejohn
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Posts: 982
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2013 2:39 am
Location: Duluth, MN
Real name: John
Gear: Roland JX-10/MT-32/D-10, Oberheim Matrix-6, Yamaha DX7/DX7-IIFD/FB-01, Korg MS-20 Mini/DSS-1, Hohner String Performer

Re: Roland JX showdown: JX-3P vs JX-8P vs Super JX10

Postby PolyMTL » Mon Feb 10, 2014 10:30 pm

I guess some will think I'm crazy but I had both JX-3P and JX-8P, each with their own programmer. I gave the JX-3P to a friend and kept the JX-8P. It sounds much more different to my Juno-6 and I like diversity ;) JX10 and 8P sure don't deserve all the hate.
User avatar
PolyMTL
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 5:52 pm
Gear: AKAI AX73
AKAI S900
ROLAND JUNO-6
ROLAND JX-8P
KORG DW-8000
KORG DSS-1
YAMAHA CS15D

Re: Roland JX showdown: JX-3P vs JX-8P vs Super JX10

Postby ninja6485 » Mon Feb 10, 2014 11:02 pm

The way the jx-8p does digital sounds is actually quite nice, and not frequently mentioned. It puts a warmer, edgier spin on some classic digital sounds that is really sort of unique. It's also pretty deep for an analog synth in its price range, with fast enough envelopes for the digital sounds; I'm surprised to hear people get bored with it. It has a lot of modulation options for subtly varying the pitch & interplay between the two oscillators, which can be the difference between a good patch and a great patch! Another plus is it sits very well in a mix. It's usually responsible for sounds that wow me months afterwards in a track, even if I didn't have quite the same impression while writing it.

I think for comparing the Jx's, you almost have to look more at where your synth collecting is going to go afterward. The 3p not only has competition with the higher priced junos, but also the lower priced alpha junos. It may be a great mid point between the two. Since I had a Juno-60 when I bought my 8p, I chose to not pursue the 3p. The Jx 8p however seems to be more of a cross between the junos and the d-50. It shares a lot in common with the presets of the d50 & tx81z, and can cover those bases fairly well if you aren't too interested in expanding into digital territory. Luckily, even if you are, the 8p holds a center position which can pair with either a juno or a d50, providing a touch of analog or digital characteristics that the other synth is lacking without stepping too much on their toes. It is definitely a smooth, lush programmer's synth, so if you're looking for more of an aggressive key players synth, you may want to lean toward the 3p.
This looks like a psychotropic reaction. No wonder it's so popular...
User avatar
ninja6485
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
 
Posts: 2095
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:13 pm
Location: Exton/ westchester
Gear: Virus Ti, Jx-8p, Juno 60, Radias, Maschine, 101,303,606,707,727,808,909, odyssey, mirage, akai s5K/s2K/s1k, drumtraks, esi4k,M1R, rx5, fizmo,d50
Band: Lyra, The Sun Worshipers

Next

Return to Synth Shootouts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest