Korg Poly-61

Korg Poly-61M Image

The Korg Poly-61 was released in 1982 as the successor to the Polysix. It was somewhat of a step up from the Polysix, as it has 2 DCOs for better reliability. It also retained the arpeggiator of the Polysix. It has a very dirty sharp sound much like the Yamaha DX7. This is good if you are into the lo-fi sound of electronica. The Poly-61 can provide cool gritty basses or trippy analog sounds and fx.

Korg Poly-61M Image

Also added is the familiar Korg joystick, which can be used to modulate the VCO or the VCF. However, its filter only has 7 steps of resonance and is not as fat as the Polysix's filter. It also uses the same method of programming the Poly-800 and Yamaha DX-7 use, so it's not a very useful synth for real-time-tweaking junkies. The first Poly-61s didn't have MIDI, but the Poly-61M released in 1984 corrects this. Overall, the Poly-61 is still a decent synth, and it can be acquired for practically nothing! It has been used by FM Static and The Faint.

81 Visitor comments
Donut
July 13, 2010 @ 1:47 pm
I love how people compare these lesser-known synths to their legendary counterparts/predecessors/namesakes as if they've played any of them ("... well, i touched a ARP2600 in Guitar Center once, and it were so fat and kicks this synths butt d00dz!!!")

This is not a Polysix, and not a Poly 800... It is a Poly-61. Programming is a little on the limited side, but - as Machineman has said - the sound quality is awesome, and the arpeggiator makes it shine extra nice. It's more hollow and cutting tones are hard to match, and it's worth the dirt-cheap prices I've seen these go for...
Machineman
May 18, 2010 @ 5:29 pm
I really love this synth! The programming and the resolution of the parameters is limited, sure. But the sound quality is very, very good. Much more hi-fi, crisp, full and fat sounding than the JX-3P, which i also own. The 3P has vastly superior programming options (with the PG-200). But i like the sound from the Poly-61 a lot (yes, a lot) more. The arpeggiator is great - instant Tangerine Dream.
P6
April 25, 2010 @ 5:54 am
Poly 800 is garbage.

Poly 61 is not bad, sometimes useful, actually quite nice but I fully believe the JX-3P has it beat as an equivelant DCO synth.

Polysix beats them all however, a true beauty. I'm just saying to anyone thinking of buying this as a 'cheap' polysix substitute (proxysix? ;) ) that it's not really comparable. Compare p61 to JX-3P not to Polysix. Of course the Dual DCO nature of P6/JX can allow you to do stuff the Polysix can't, that's why I love JX-3P too. Polysix however is in a different class and can make awesome sounds all day long.
Siebe Pol
February 21, 2010 @ 10:40 am
It's also possible to add midi to the non-midi version.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ON-f43zaspw
kb
February 16, 2010 @ 6:57 pm
The Poly-61 becomes a _lot_ more fun if you modify it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYpo_AF5hSE
 
Post Comment!
VSE Rating

It’s Good

User Rating

Rated 4.41 (995 Votes)

  • Specifications
  • Polyphony - 6 Voices
  • Oscillators - DCO1:sawtooth, pulse, and square; DCO-2: sawtooth, square
  • LFO - 1 LFO can modulate the DCOs or the Filter
  • Filter - 1 lowpass filter w/ ADSR
  • Memory - 64 patches
  • VCA - ADSR
  • Keyboard - 61 keys
  • Arpeg/Seq - Arpeggiator with external sync
  • Effects - Chorus
  • Control - MIDI (on later Poly-61M models)
  • Date Produced - 1982 - 1986

Errors or Corrections? Send them here.