Roland D-10 / D-110

Roland D-10 Image

Second generation D-50 style synthesis. The D-10 is a Digital Linear Arithmetic Synthesizer and the D-110 is its upgraded rackmount version. Capable of decent acoustic sounds and great new synth-type sounds the D-10/110 is a great and cheaper alternative to the popular D-50. It has a confusing synthesis / editing method composed of tones, partials and timbres. Basically it all boils down to tricky programming which, if you know what your doing, can have interesting and unique results. On-board drum sounds, reverb effects and internal / external memory storage are also a plus.

Roland D-110 Image

The D-110 rackmount version adds 6 individual outputs, and the follow-up D-20 keyboard version adds an 8-track sequencer. Definitely worth a listen for any musician on a budget! It has been used by Suzanne Vega, Future Sound of London, and Information Society.

Check Roland D-10 / D-110 Prices on eBay

The link above will take you to a search for this synth to see active listings with more images, specs and information. If you don't find it there, try looking in our forum marketplace. Our marketplace gets thousands of visits every week so make sure to check back often if you want to buy or sell a synth.

Related forum topics

Comments

Are you looking to buy or sell a Roland D-10 / D-110? Post an ad in Gear For Sale or a request in Gear Wanted. For spare parts and repair services check out Gear Services & Other Goods. Our forums also has a Buyer’s Guide section where you can ask for advice on buying synthesizers.

101 Visitor comments
Casimir's Blake
November 14, 2012 @ 6:13 pm
@illogicgate

Yes I am quite aware of that, it being analogue was the reason I acquired an A.Juno in the first place. I was not and am not comparing the sound of the AJ and the D-10 by saying the former is infinitely easier to PROGRAM (even when just using the alpha dial) than the latter.

The D-10 requires a huge amount of work to achieve good, let alone interesting, sounds. The AJ does not. Having spent more time with my D-10 I am still convinced it isn't worth the hassle, but with extreme layering and FX it might be "moderately capable." They're certainly cheap...
alen
November 12, 2012 @ 3:52 pm
While the D50 easily does "fat" due to PWM and chorus, the D10 etc models can do fat too despite lacking both. You do chorus the hard way by layering multiple partials & voices, each nearly identical with slight differences in tuning, filtering & envelopes. Give partials different but very small pitch envelopes and vibrato amounts so that no pitch shifting is audible. Use the first segment of envelopes to give each partial a slightly different start delay. In the case of pitch this also delays the start of the vibrato because they are both implemented using the same hardware (cheeky bastards).
alen
November 12, 2012 @ 3:36 pm
It's not often acknowledged that the D50/D110/D10/D20/D5 were the first digital synths to implement virtual analog synthesis. The Swedes act like they invented that. True, the resonant filters are implemented by a yet-to-be-fully-explained clever manipulation of the basic waveforms, which is why they can't be used on the PCM samples, but that doesn't somehow invalidate the design as true virtual analog. And personally I think the filters sound good. Not "syrupy" good but "interesting" good. They have character. Whil Minimoog sounds are unlikely, some JP8 and Oberheim sounds are doable.
alen
November 12, 2012 @ 3:29 pm
Interesting that these synths still get some attention 20+ years after release. They may be poor relations of the D50 that were robbed of features like chorus, PWM, multiple LFOs and even portamento, but they ARE multimbral and that is their strength. I bought a D10 in '88 because at the time it was the most acoustic sounding multi-timbral synth that I could afford. The acousticness is due to the short PCM samples used mainly for attacks, which works surprisingly well (but not, LOL, for the piano!). However, the virtual analog side of these synths is why they are still useful today.
IllogicGate
October 25, 2012 @ 5:06 pm
Tim and Casimir's Blake. The Alpha Juno is analog. The D10 is digital. Analog and Digital are *different* therefore it is silly to take issue with the fact that they don't sound like each other.

-IllogicGate
 
Post Comment!
VSE Rating

It’s Good

User Rating

Rated 3.37 (728 Votes)

  • Check Prices on eBay
  • The link above will take you to a search for this synth to see active listings. If you don't find it there, try looking in our forum marketplace or post a wanted classified.
  • Specifications
  • Polyphony - 32 voices
  • Oscillators - Digital LAS (Linear Arithmetic Synthesis) & ROM Samples
  • Effects - 8 Effects
  • Multitimbral - 9 parts
  • Drums - 1 kit, 63 sounds
  • Memory - 128 internal & 128 external patches, 64 performances
  • Keyboard - 61 note with velocity sensitivity (D-10)
  • Control - MIDI
  • Date Produced - 1988

Errors or Corrections? Send them here.